Hello everyone! It has been quite a while since my last blog
entry, so I figured I would update you all on some of the activities I have
performed while at Sunflower Kids over the past several months. One of my
latest volunteering activities was cleaning up around the main building of the
organization. This included washing windows, putting away toys in the rooms in
which parents visit with their children, and reorganizing a bookshelf. While
this experience in and of itself was obviously not an overly taxing or moving
one—the tasks I was responsible for completing included moving Barbie dolls
from the “Action Figures” toy bin to the “Dolls” toy bin—just being in the
offices of Sunflower Kids and seeing their operation run was a learning
experience all on its own.
It is an odd experience to see a parent playing with
his or her child and to know in the back of your mind that the parent you are
watching was found guilty of doing something so harmful or disturbing that the
only circumstances under which he or she is allowed to visit his or her own
children is in a closely monitored and highly regulated environment. Interestingly enough, these parents did not look like the “abusive or substance
abusing parent” stereotype would suggest. These people are human beings just
like the rest of us, and they look like regular people. These people look like
they could be someone’s next door neighbor or co-worker. I would wager that
many of the acquaintances of these people are not even aware of the things
these people do. This provides not only a lesson in not judging a book by its
cover, but also a somber reminder that in many cases, you do not know as much
about someone as you think you do, and you do not know what happens behind
closed doors in a household of which you are not a member.
Do you believe that more programs like Sunflower Kids should be funded to ensure that all people can see their kids, or no? What are the inherit benefits or disadvantages from programs like these?
ReplyDeleteI think that, given the laws in place in Kentucky regarding child custody, I would like to see places like SFK get more state funding, but ultimately I believe that if a parent does something so vile and disturbing that he/she cannot be in a room with his/her child unattended for fear of what may happen to the child, he/she has forfeited his/her right to see his/her child. I believe that the laws currently in place force these children to either actively protest seeing their own parent-- which I cannot image being an easy decision for a young child to make-- or see a parent that has abused them or their other parent. I guess to give a more direct answer to your question, I would say they should be funded more and the errors in this system are not committed by programs like SFK.
Delete